Protecting Criminal Defendants' Rights When the Government Adduces Scientific Evidence: The Confrontation Clause and Other Alternatives─A Response to Professor Giannelli

James W. Diehm

Protecting Criminal Defendants' Rights When the Government Adduces Scientific Evidence: The Confrontation Clause and Other Alternatives─A Response to Professor Giannelli

James W. Diehm

Widener University Commonwealth Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	85
Journal	Capital University Law Review
Volume	22
Issue number	1
State	Published - 1993

Access to Document

fulltext.pdfFinal published version, 390 KBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{7cbb7bb634a5419687f41256d204a121,

title = "Protecting Criminal Defendants' Rights When the Government Adduces Scientific Evidence: The Confrontation Clause and Other Alternatives─A Response to Professor Giannelli",

keywords = "criminal law, evidence, scientific evidence, expert witnesses",

author = "Diehm, \{James W.\}",

year = "1993",

language = "American English",

volume = "22",

pages = "85",

journal = "Capital University Law Review",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protecting Criminal Defendants' Rights When the Government Adduces Scientific Evidence: The Confrontation Clause and Other Alternatives─A Response to Professor Giannelli

AU - Diehm, James W.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

KW - criminal law

KW - evidence

KW - scientific evidence

KW - expert witnesses

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 85

JO - Capital University Law Review

JF - Capital University Law Review

IS - 1

ER -