Loss of Self-Control, Dual-Process Theories and Provocation

Michal Buchhandler-Raphael

Loss of Self-Control, Dual-Process Theories and Provocation

Widener University Commonwealth Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Fordham Law Review
Volume	88
Issue number	5
State	Published - 2020

Cite this

@article{05f88c73d5254635a0f99c84cc433e7d,

title = "Loss of Self-Control, Dual-Process Theories and Provocation",

author = "Michal Buchhandler-Raphael",

note = "Contemporary understanding of the provocation defense views the {"}loss of self-control{"} theory as the cornerstone of this partial excuse. In considering whether to reduce murder charges to manslaughter, juries and judges rely on this theory to determine if the defendant lost self-control after experiencing intense emotional arousal and if a reasonable person would have also likely lost self-control in similar circumstances.",

year = "2020",

language = "American English",

volume = "88",

journal = "Fordham Law Review",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Loss of Self-Control, Dual-Process Theories and Provocation

AU - Buchhandler-Raphael, Michal

N1 - Contemporary understanding of the provocation defense views the "loss of self-control" theory as the cornerstone of this partial excuse. In considering whether to reduce murder charges to manslaughter, juries and judges rely on this theory to determine if the defendant lost self-control after experiencing intense emotional arousal and if a reasonable person would have also likely lost self-control in similar circumstances.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

UR - http://fordhamlawreview.org/issues/loss-of-self-control-dual-process-theories-and-provocation/

M3 - Article

VL - 88

JO - Fordham Law Review

JF - Fordham Law Review

IS - 5

ER -

Loss of Self-Control, Dual-Process Theories and Provocation

Other files and links

Cite this